Informing the Public about the Dangers of a Pandemic. Early COVID-19 Coverage by News Organizations in Kazakhstan

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26577/HJ.2021.v60.i2.01
        95 97

Abstract

The global pandemic of the coronavirus COVID-19 has hampered the work of Kazakhstani media. A significant part of news organizations were forced to change priorities in their usual activities, while journalists themselves felt the negative consequences of the pandemic. The purpose of the study is to study the work of news organizations to inform the public about the dangers of a new type of coronavirus. The main idea of the scientific article is to present the results of a study of the impact of the pandemic on the activities of Kazakhstani media from March to August 2020. The work used quantitative and qualitative research methods: the survey method of editors of television, radio, print and online publications and the method of in-depth interviews with chief editors. The main results showed that in the first six months of the pandemic and the restrictive measures introduced in this regard, media employees and managers faced obstacles in obtaining reliable information about the coronavirus from government sources, had problems accessing the necessary information, felt pressure from the authorities and fought against fakes in social networks. Despite this, the domestic media tried to cover the problem from all sides. At the same time, full-fledged coverage with a qualitative analysis based on verified information and the opinion of compe

tent experts has acquired particular importance against the backdrop of various rumors and fakes about the coronavirus. The findings of the study indicate that journalists independently chose sources and tone, but were subject to self-censorship in their coverage of the pandemic. The value of this scientific work lies in the fact that it can help increase the professionalism and responsibility of journalists in covering both global and local crises, as well as move the government towards greater transparency and more complete disclosure of information to the press and citizens during crises. The practical significance of the study lies in the analysis of the activities of news organizations in the pandemic. The results of scientific work can be used in the research and practice of journalists and media leaders.

Key words: News organizations, priorities, COVID-19 pandemic, self-censorship.

References

Әдебиеттер

Вакурова Н.В. (2015). Журналистика в период кризиса: поведенческие модели и приоритеты в освещении (по результатам экспертного опроса). // Вестник университета, (5). – С. 289-293.
Coombs, W. T. (2019). Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding (5th edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Fearn-Banks, K. (2017). Crisis Communications: A Casebook Approach. New York: Routledge. Fink, S. (2002). Crisis Management: Planning for the Inevitable. iUniverse.
Junisbai, B. (2011). «Oligarchs and Ownership: The Role of Financial-Industrial Groups in Controlling
Kazakhstan’s ‘Independent’ Media.» In After the Czars and Commissars: Journalism in Authoritarian Post-Soviet Central Asia, edited by E. Freedman and R. Shafer, 35–57. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
Kurambayev, B., and E. Freedman. (2019). «Ethics and Journalism in Central Asia: A Comparative Study of Kazakhstan, Kyr- gyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan.» Journal of Media Ethics 35, no. 1: 31–34.
Lee, T., and J. Bottomley. (2010). «Commentary: Pending Crises: Crisis Journalism and SARS in Australia.» Asia Pacific Media Educator 20: 269–276.
Ulmer, R. R., T. L. Sellnow, and M. W. Seeger. (2017). Effective Crisis Communication: Moving from Crisisto Opportunity (4th edition). SAGE.

Электронды ресурстар

Bisam.kz. (2020). Коронавирус в Казахстане: Новые данные социологического мониторинга. http://www.bisam.kz/ru/
news/222-2020-06-24-13-19-27
Coronavirus2020.kz. (2020). https://www.coronavirus2020.kz/ru
International Research & Exchanges Board. (2019). Media Sustainability Index. https://www.irex.org/sites/default/files/pdf/ media-sustainability-index-europe-eurasia-2019-full.pdf
Internews.kz. (2019). Исследование потребностей медиасообщества Казахстана. https://ru.internews.kz/wp-content/up- loads/2020/01/issledovanie-potrebnosteymediasoobschestva-kazahstana.pdf
Қазақстан Республикасы Премьер-Министрінің ресми ақпараттық ресурсы. (2019). https://primeminister.kz/ru/in- quiries/72
Қазақстан Республикасының Ақпарат және қоғамдық даму министрлігі. (2020). www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/qogam/ press/article/details/332?lang=ru
Liter.kz. (2020). «Позиция Казахстана в рейтинге свободы прессы не отражает реальности – Абаев». https://liter.kz/pozic- ziya-kazahstana-v-rejtinge-svobody-pressy-ne-otrazhaetrealnosti-abaev/
Reporters without Borders (2020). World Press Freedom Index. https://rsf.org/en/ranking/2020

References

Coombs, W. T. (2019). Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding (5th edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Fearn-Banks, K. (2017). Crisis Communications: A Casebook Approach. New York: Routledge. Fink, S. (2002). Crisis Management: Planning for the Inevitable. iUniverse.
Junisbai, B. (2011). «Oligarchs and Ownership: The Role of Financial-Industrial Groups in Controlling
Kazakhstan’s ‘Independent’ Media.» In After the Czars and Commissars: Journalism in Authoritarian Post-Soviet Central Asia, edited by E. Freedman and R. Shafer, 35–57. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
Kurambayev, B., and E. Freedman. (2019). «Ethics and Journalism in Central Asia: A Comparative Study of Kazakhstan, Kyr- gyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan.» Journal of Media Ethics 35, no. 1: 31–34.
Lee, T., and J. Bottomley. (2010). «Commentary: Pending Crises: Crisis Journalism and SARS in Australia.» Asia Pacific Media Educator 20: 269–276.
Ulmer, R. R., T. L. Sellnow, and M. W. Seeger. (2017). Effective Crisis Communication: Moving from Crisisto Opportunity (4th edition). SAGE.
Vakurova N.V. (2015). Zhurnalistika v period krizisa: povedencheskiye modeli i prioritety v osveshchenii (po rezul’tatam ekspertnogo oprosa) [Journalism in a Period of Crisis: Behavioral Models and Priorities in Coverage (Based on the Results of an Expert Survey)]. Vestnik universiteta, (5), 289-293.

Electronic resources

Bisam.kz. (2020) Koronavirus v Kazakhstane: Novye dannye sotsiologicheskogo monitoring [Coronavirus in Kazakhstan: New data from sociological monitoring] http://www.bisam.kz/ru/news/222-2020-06-24-13-19-27
Coronavirus2020.kz. (2020). https://www.coronavirus2020.kz/ru
International Research & Exchanges Board. (2019). Media Sustainability Index. https://www.irex.org/sites/default/files/pdf/ media-sustainability-index-europeeurasia-2019-full.pdf
Internews.kz. (2019). Issledovanie potrebnostei mediasoobshchestva Kazakhstana [Study of the needs of the media community in Kazakhstan]. https://ru.internews.kz/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/issledovanie-potrebnosteymediasoobschestva-kazahstana.pdf
Liter.kz. (2020). «Pozitsiia Kazakhstana v reitinge svobody pressy ne otrazhaet real’nosti – Abayev.» [Kazakhstan’s position in the press freedom rating does not reflect reality – Abaev] April 24, 2020. https://liter.kz/pozicziya-kazahstana-v-rejtinge-svobody- pressy-ne-otrazhaetrealnosti-abaev/
Qazaqstan Respwblïkası Premer-Mïnïstriniñ resmï aqparattıq reswrsı. (2019). [Official Information Resource of the Prime Min- ister of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. https://primeminister.kz/ru/inquiries/72
Qazaqstan Respwblïkasınıñ Aqparat jäne qoğamdıq damw mïnïstrligi. (2020) [Ministry of Information and Social Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/qogam/press/article/details/332?lang=ru
Reporters without Borders (2020). World Press Freedom Index. https://rsf.org/en/ranking/2020

Downloads

How to Cite

Nurumov, B. A., Berkenova, G. E., Fridman, E. M., & Ibrayeva, G. Z. (2021). Informing the Public about the Dangers of a Pandemic. Early COVID-19 Coverage by News Organizations in Kazakhstan. Herald of Journalism, 60(2), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.26577/HJ.2021.v60.i2.01

Issue

Section

Journalism: Society. Language. History. Policy. Law. Economy.