Efficiency and features of projects: factcheck.kz and stopfake.kz in Kazakh journalism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26577/HJ.2023.v67.i1.03Abstract
The article is devoted to comparing and evaluating the work and peculiarities of the factcheck.kz and stopfake.kz projects in today's Kazakh journalism.
Fact checking determines whether any cultural-scientific information or small news are true or false. In other countries, fact-checking resources have their own features and directions, and the opinions of experts are different. The struggle with false information, how Kazakhstan and the countries of the world are responding to this problem in the face of its danger is relevant in today's public communication field.
The purpose of the research article is to show the effectiveness and specificity of fact-checking resources, the main mechanism of combating false information in the modern world media environment, to verify information transmitted at a very large speed under the influence of the intensity of the flow of information and digital technologies.
During the writing of the article, fact-checking work was analyzed, and its history and development features were summarized. A comparative analysis of the methods of data verification abroad was carried out.
False information has entered our lives so quickly that it has become difficult to distinguish false from true information.
Misunderstandings in various situations may occur if people cannot distinguish false from true information, so the necessity and importance of the factcheck.kz and stopfake.kz projects can be summarized. Evaluating the effectiveness and use of the factcheck.kz and stopfake.kz projects in information differentiation will open the way for fundamental scientific research in this direction.
Keywords: journalism, factchek.kz, stopfake.kz, project, fact-checking, false information, foreign country, efficiency.
References
2 Гороховский А. Фактчекинг журналистика зерттеуінің тренді: мүмкіндігі мен болашағы: Практикалық оқу құралы. – Алматы, 2017. – 312 с.
3 Elizabeth J., Mantzarlis A. The Fact Is, Fact-Checking Can Be Better [Электронный ресурс] // Poynter. 07.07.2016. URL: https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2016/the-fact-is-fact- checking-can-be-better/ (дата обращения: 20.10.2020).
4 https://factcheck.kz/
5 https://stopfake.kz/kk/
6 Ильченко С.Н. Фейковая журналистика как элемент современной шоу-цивилизации// Журналистика цифровой эпохи: как меняется профессия: материалы меж-дунар. Науч-практ.конф. (Екатеринбург, 14-15 апреля 2016 г.). Екатеринбург:Изд-воУФУ, 2016. – С.110-112.
7 https://kk.wikipedia.org/wiki/
8 Brooks М. Helping kids be safe, confident explorers of the online world [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://beinternetawesome.withgoogle.com/en_us (дата обращения: 06.10.2020).
9 https://kazbilim.kz/?p=3799
10 Diakopoulos N. Algorithmic accountability // Digital Journalism. 2014. № 3 (3). P. 398–415.
11 Ильченко С. Н. Как нас обманывают СМИ. Манипуляция информацией. СПб.:Пи-тер, 2019. – 320 с.
12 Пономарев Н. Ф. Фейковые новости в информационной войне // Филология в XXI веке. 2019 №2 ( 4) С.54-64.
13 Распопова Е.С., Богдан Е.Н. Фейковые новости: Информационная мистификация. учеб.пособие: Москва: Аспект Пресс, 2018. – 112 с.
14 Стернин И.А., Шестерина А. М. Маркеры фейка в медиатекстах. Воронеж: Ритм, 2020. – 136 с.
15 Корнев М.С. Фактчекинг: 5 надежных способов проверить информацию // Журналист, 2015, №5. – с.54-56.
16 Минюшева И.Ф. Основные тренды в развитии медиа 2016 // Российскаф наука и образование сегодня: проблемы и перспективы. 2016.№3 (10), – С.33-35.
17 Суходолов А.П., Бычкова А.М.«Фейковые новости» как феномен современного медиапространства: понятие, виды, назначение, меры противодействия // Вопросы теории и практики журналистики. – 2017. Т6. №2. – С.143-168.
18 https://factcheck.kz/glavnoe/top-10-samyx-chitaemyx-materialov-factcheck-kz-2022-goda/ (дата обращения: 31.12.2022).
19 Collins Dictionary: fake news. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.collinsdictionary. com/dictionary/english/fake-news (дата обращения: 07.12.2020).
20 De Code van de Raad voor de Journalistiek [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.rvdj.be/sites/default/files/pdf/journalistieke-code.pdf (дата обращения: 15.11.2020).
21 Raad voor de Journalistiek [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.rvdj.nl (дата об- ращения: 15.11.20).
Reference
1 Brooks М. Helping kids be safe, confident explorers of the online world [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://beinternetawesome.withgoogle.com/en_us (data obrashcheniya: 06.10.2020).
2 Gorohovskij A. (2017) Faktcheking zhurnalistika zertteuіnің trendі: mүmkіndіgі men bolashaғy: Praktikalyқ oқu құraly [Trends in Fact-Checking Journalism Research: Opportunities and Prospects: A Practical Study Guide]. – Almaty, 2017. – 312 s.
3 Diakopoulos N. Algorithmic accountability // Digital Journalism. 2014. № 3 (3). P. 398–415.
4 Elizabeth J., Mantzarlis A. The Fact Is, Fact-Checking Can Be Better [Elektronnyj resurs] // Poynter. 07.07.2016. URL: https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2016/the-fact-is-fact- checking-can-be-better/ (data obrashcheniya: 20.10.2020).
5 De Code van de Raad voor de Journalistiek [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.rvdj.be/sites/default/files/pdf/journalistieke-code.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 15.11.2020).
6 Il'chenko S.N.(2016) Fejkovaya zhurnalistika kak element sovremennoj shou-civilizacii// ZHurnalistika cifrovoj epohi: kak menyaetsya professiya: materialy mezh-dunar. Nauch-prakt.konf. (Ekaterinburg, 14-15 aprelya 2016g.) [Fake journalism as an element of modern show-civilization // Journalism of the digital age: how the profession is changing: materials of the international. Scientific-practical conf. (Yekaterinburg, April 14-15, 2016)]. Ekaterinburg:Izd-voUFU, 2016. – s.110-112.
7 Il'chenko S. N.(2019) Kak nas obmanyvayut SMI. Manipulyaciya informaciej [How the media deceives us. Information manipulation]. SPb.:Pi-ter, 2019. – 320 s.
8 Kornev M.S. (2015). Faktcheking: 5 nadezhnyh sposobov proverit' informaciyu [Fact-Checking: 5 Reliable Ways to Verify Information]. Zhurnalist, 2015, №5. – s.54-56.
9 Collins Dictionary: fake news. [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.collinsdictionary. com/dictionary/english/fake-news (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2020).
10 Minyusheva I.F. (2016). Osnovnye trendy v razvitii media 2016 [Main trends in media development 2016]. Rossijskaf nauka i obrazovanie segodnya: problemy i perspektivy. 2016, №3 (10), – s.33-35.
11 Ponomarev N. F.(2019) Fejkovye novosti v informacionnoj vojne // Filologiya v XXI veke [Fake news in the information war // Philology in the XXI century]. – 2019. №2 (4) s.54-64.
12 Raspopova E.S., Bogdan E.N. (2018) Fejkovye novosti: Informacionnaya mistifikaciya [Fake News: Information hoax]. ucheb.posobie: Moskva: Aspekt Press, 2018. – 112 s.
13 Sternin I.A., Shesterina A.M. (2020). Markery fejka v mediatekstah [Fake markers in media texts]. Voronezh: Ritm, 2020. – 136 s.
14 Suhodolov A.P., Bychkova A.M. (2017). «Fejkovye novosti» kak fenomen sovremennogo mediaprostranstva: ponyatie, vidy, naznachenie, mery protivodejstviya [«Fake news» as a phenomenon of modern media space: concept, types, purpose, countermeasures]. Voprosy teorii i praktiki zhurnalistiki. – 2017. T6. №2. – s.143-168.
15 Raad voor de Journalistiek [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.rvdj.nl (data obrashcheniya: 15.11.20).
16 Fejk aкparat: otandyк zhаne аlemdіk tаzhіrbie, mediasauattylyқty arttyru men zhazalau sharalary.https://www.inform.kz/kz/feyk-akparat-otandyk-zhane-alemdik-tazhiribe-mediasauattylykty-arttyru-men-zhazalau-sharalary_a3896221 (7.02.2022.)
17 https://factcheck.kz/glavnoe/top-10-samyx-chitaemyx-materialov-factcheck-kz-2022-goda/ (data obrashcheniya: 31.12.2022).
18 https://factcheck.kz/
19 https://stopfake.kz/kk/
20 https://kk.wikipedia.org/wiki/
21 https://kazbilim.kz/?p=3799
