Intellectual capital in the fokus of humanitarian technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26577/HJ.2019.v52.i2.08Кілттік сөздер:
intellectual capital, humanitarian technologies, modernization of society, intellectual nation.Аннотация
The formation of an intellectual nation is recognized as one of the strategic objectives of the development of Kazakhstan, where the main vectors are quality education and the support of the younger generation. According to reviews of foreign specialists in the field of education, as well as the results of contests, tests, etc. The Kazakh youth have a high level of intellectual potential. The only thing we need is to be able to use it correctly. It is not so easy to give a good education to a future specialist, and also to help him discover his talent and abilities, create conditions for the skillful use of the knowledge gained, and ensure the formation of competitive employees.
From a strategic point of view, it is important to identify indicators that are most closely associated with economic (or otherwise desirable) growth. On the other hand, if the analysis is carried out on a national scale, it becomes obvious that even the national specific economic incentives of the Intellectual nation can be identified. This article focuses on the formation of the “intellectual nation” of the society of 21st century, when a creative person becomes the main source of development.
The purpose of the work is to reveal the features of the formation of intellectual capital in Kazakhstan in the focus of humanitarian technologies. The research methodology of the scientific work contains methods of system analysis: methods of social experiment; behavioral methods of research of social phenomena, methods of social design, social engineering, sociometric studies; dialogue methods for humanitarian studies. The main results are studied theoretical issues and practical application of humanitarian technology; The analysis of rethinking, popularization and transformation of the development of intellectual capital. The value of the study in the comprehensive study of modernization in Kazakhstan; in fundamental and applied research in the field of humanitarian technologies.
The scientific and practical significance of the work is determined in the development of scientific concepts, the implementation of state information policy, in the implementation of integrated programs; in the activities of national, international centers; in forecasting the prospects for the development of the ideological concept of “Ruhani zagyru”.
The practical significance of the work results is that the research results are applicable in the field of mass communication, political science, sociology, cultural studies.
Библиографиялық сілтемелер
http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/ expertize/5986
2. Bartel Ann P., The Migration Decision: Whats Role Does Job – Mobility Play? American Economic Review 69 (December,
1979): 775–786.
3. Весker G. The Economic Way of Looking at Life. Nobel Lecture, 1992 Человеческий капитал (главы из книги) //
США: ЭПИ, 1993, №11–12.
4. Berger p.l. Priglasheniye v sotsiologiyu: gumanisticheskaya perspektiva [Invitation to sociology: a humanistic perspective
]/ per. S angl. O.A.Oberemko. M.: Aspekt-Press.1996. - 168 s.
5. Bergson A. Tvorcheskaya evolyutsiya. [Creative evolution ]M.. «Kanon-press»; «Kuchkovo pole». 1998. - 260 s.
6. Bounfour A. University of Marne La Valle, France Assessing Performance of European Innovation Systems: An intellectual
Capital Indexes Perspective
7. Dyurkgeym E .D. Sotsiologiya. Ee predmet. metod. prednaznacheniye [Sociology. Its subject, method, purpose].Per. s fr..
sostavleniye. poslesloviye i primechaniya A. B. Gofmana.— M.: Kanon. 1995.— 352 s.
8. Diltey V. Predposylki ili usloviya soznaniya libo nauchnogo poznaniya [Prerequisites or conditions of consciousness or
scientific knowledge ]// Voprosy filosofii. — 2001. — № 9. — S. 124—125.
9. Eisenstadt S.N. The Great Revolutions and the Civilizations of Modernity. — Brill, 2006. — С. 44. — 227 с.
10. Eyzenshtadt Sh. Novaya paradigma modernizatsii [A new paradigm of modernization] // Sravnitelnoye izucheniye
tsivilizatsiy. Khrestomatiya. – M.. 1998. – S. 471.
11. Friedman, M. The Basic Postulates of the Demand Theory Text. / M. Friedman // Economic Studies Quarterly. Vol. 14. –
1963. – P. 115-144.
12. Fortune, T. S. Intellectual Capital Text. / T. S. Fortune. – L., 1998. –202 p.
13. Gumanitarnyye tekhnologii v vuzovskoy obrazovatel'noy praktike: teoriya i metodologiya proyektirovaniya: Uchebnoye
posobiye. [Humanitarian technologies in high school educational practice: theory and design methodology: Tutorial.] - St. Petersburg,
2007. - 198 p.
14. Kendrick, Jhon W. Formation and stocks of total capital. – N.Y., 1976.
15. Kont O. Obshchiy obzor pozitivizma [A new paradigm of modernization]/ Perevod s frantsuzskogo I. A. Shapiro. Pod
red. E. L. Radlova. — Izd. 2-e. — M.: LIBROKOM. 2011. — 296 s. — (Iz naslediya mirovoy filosofskoy mysli: istoriya filosofii).
16. Kerr C.A. The uses of the University. – Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982. – V. IX. – 204 p
17. Kassirer E. Filosofiya Prosveshcheniya [Philosophy of Education] - M.: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya. 2004.
- 400 s.
18. Kontseptsiya razvitiya obrazovaniya Respubliki Kazakhstan. [The concept of development of education of the Republic
of Kazakhstan]- www.unesco.kz
19. Kontseptsiya obrazovaniya Respubliki Kazakhstan. [The concept of education of the Republic of Kazakhstan]
-Introduction.- www.unesco.kz
20. Lipset S. Agrarian Socialism: The Cooperative Commonwealth Federation in Saskatchewan: a Study in Political Sociology
University of California Press, 1971 – 487 Р.
21. Lerner D.The Passing of Traditional Society: From Modernization to Globalization: Perspectives on Development and
Social Change. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2000. – 135 р.
22. Lukyanov D.V. Istoriograficheskoye znaniye i gumanitarnyye tekhnologii sovremennosti. Kommunikativnyye strategii
kul'tury i gumanitarnyye tekhnologii. Nauchno-metodicheskiye materialy. [Historiographical knowledge and modern technologies
of the humanities. Communicative strategies of culture and humanitarian technologies. Scientific and methodological materials.] - St.
Petersburg, 2007. - 79 p.
23. Levashov V.K. Intellektual'nyy potentsial obshchestva: sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya i prognozirovaniye [Intellectual
potential of society: sociological research and forecasting] http://www.gtmarket.ru/ratings/legatum-prosperity-index/info.
24. Nitsshe F. Volya k vlasti. Opyt pereotsenki vsekh tsennostey [Will to power. The experience of revaluation of all values] /
Per.s nem. E.Gertsyk i dr.- M.: Kulturnaya Revolyutsiya. 2005.- 880
25. Nazarbayev N.A. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskaya modernizatsiya– glavnyy vektor razvitiya Kazakhstana [Socio-economic
modernization is the main vector of development of Kazakhstan] // www.akorda.kz
26. Parsons T. Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. ... N.Y.: The Free Press, 1978. – 156 р.
27. Riggs, F. W. Ethnicity, Nationalism, Race, Minority: a Semantic/Onomantic Exercise. F. W. Riggs // International Sociology
1991. - Vol. 6 - № 3.
28. Prusak, L. Knowledge in Organizations Text. / L. Prusak. Boston, 1997. – 273 p.
29. Rostow W. The stages of economic growth. – Cambridge, 1960. – Р. 206
30. Stewart T.A. Intellectual Capital. The New Wealth of Organizations. – N.Y. – L., Doubleday / Currency, 1997. Copyright
– T.A.Stewart, 1997
31. Shils E. Tradition //Essays on modernization of underdeveloped societies. – N.-Y., 1972. – 98 р.
32. Samuel P. Huntington. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. 1996. Хантингтон С. Столкновение
цивилизаций. под общей редакцией К. Королева. — М., 2003. – 206 с.
33. Stepin V. Theoretical Knowledge / Springer 2005Humanities, Social Sciences and Law // https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-
3046-0
34. Suslov E.V., Valery B. Golubev, Sergey A. Zhuravlev, Elena P. Kartashova, Anna Rotar, Andrey Bolshakov and
GennadiSalmijanov , 2016. Humanitarian Knowledge as a Resource for the Political Conflict Management. The Social Sciences, 11:
1685-1691.
35. Sultanbaeva G.S., Kulsarieva A.T., Zhumashova Zh.A. Ot intellektual'noy natsii – k intellektual'nomu potentsialu.
Kollektivnaya monografiya. [From intellectual nation to intellectual potential. Collective monograph.] - Almaty: IE Volkova N.A.,
2012.-9 p.
36. Tennis F. Teoreticheskaya sotsiologiya: Antologiya: V 2 ch. [Theoretical sociology: anthology: 2 hours]/ Per. s angl.. fr..
nem.. it. Sost. i obshch. red. S. P. Bankovskoy. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «Universitet». 2002. — Ch. 1. — 424 s.
37. Veber M. Izbrannyye proizvedeniya:[ Selected works] Per. s nem.; sost.. obshch. red. i poslesl. Yu. N. Davydova; predisl.
P. P. Gaydenko; komment. A. F. Filippova. — M.: Progress. 1990.
38. Wahren 1987, Picot / Wolff 1997, Kieser / Hegele / Klimmer 1998, Reichwald 1999.
39. Zavrazhin A.V. Sovremennoye gumanitarnoye poznaniye i gumanitarnyye nauki[Modern Humanities and Humanities].
Vestnik MIEP. 2016. № 3 (24). S. 51-59.
40. Zimmel G. Izbrannoye. [Selected works. Volume 2.Contemplation of life Tom 2. Sozertsaniye zhizni - M.: Yurist. 1996.
607 s.
41. Zhuravlev V.A. Intellektual'nyy potentsial kreativnogo obshchestva – elementy i kharakteristika // Kreativnaya ekonomika.
[Intellectual potential of a creative society - elements and characteristics // Creative Economy.] - 2009. — № 8 (32). — С. 3-14.
