Problems of research of information and communicative processes in political sphere
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26577/HJ.202159.i1.07Abstract
The role of information in the life of a human and the state, individual social groups and society is very important. Information is also a tool for communication between the authorities and the target group. In other words, the communication of the state with various categories of society in domestic and foreign policy is carried out through information.
The purpose of the study - to focus on the main issues in the study of information and communica- tion processes in the political system of the state; analysis of the theoretical and methodological bases of the study of the concepts of “information” and “communication”; identification of state features in the study of information and communication processes in the political sphere. The authors also aim to reveal the main stages in the emergence and development of political communication between political players.
The object of research is information and the relationships formed through it, is communication.
Applied social research methods were used in the work. Quantitative and qualitative research, in particular, questionnaires, expert analysis of the works of domestic, western and russian researchers, classifications were made on the methodological basis of the study.
The results of the study are of great practical importance in the implementation of information and communication processes in the state political system. The results of the work can be used in the meth- ods of political science and journalism, political communication in the media.
Key words: information, communication, politics, society, management.
References
Abramson P.R., Aldrich, J.H. Rohde, D.W. Change and Continuity in the 2000 Elections. Washington, D.C., CQ Press, 2002: 337. Beniger I.R. The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard
University Press, 1986: 493.
Bodrijjar Zh. Rekviem po mass-media. (Pojetika i politika: Al’manah Rossijsko-francuzskogo centra sociologii i filosofii Instituta sociologii Rossijskoj Akademii nauk) Moskva, Institut jeksperimental’noj sociologii. SPb.: Aletejja, 1999: 193, 226.
Chaffee S., Roser C.Involvement and the Consistent of Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviour. Communication Research,1986: 377. Cohen B.C. The Press and Foreign Policy. Princeton N.J., Princeton University Press, 1963: 288.
Edelman M. Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988: 137.
Edited by Rosengren K.E., Wenner L.A., P. Palmgreen. Media Gratifications Research: Current Perspectives. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1985: 311.
Edited by Miller W.E., Levitin T.E. Leadership and Change: The New Politics and the American Electorate. Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop Publishers, 1976: 267.
Edited by Nimmon D., Sanders K.R. (Handbook of Political Communication). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1981: 732. Edited by Swanson D.L., Nimmon D.P. New Directions in Political Communication. (A Resource Book). Newbury Park, Calif.:
Sage Publications, 1990: 413.
Edited by L.L. Kaid., Mahwah, N.J. (Handbook of Political Communication Research). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004: 541. Festinger L. Teorija kognitivnogo dissonansa. SPb.: Juventa, 1999: 317.
Ginsberg B., Shefter M. Politics by other means: politicians, prosecutors, and the press from Watergate to Whitewater. New York: Norton, 2002: 266.
Gerbner G. Institutional Pressures on Mass Communicators. (The Sociology of Mass Media Communicators: Sociological Review Monograph). University of Keels, 1969: 205, 248.
Graber D.A. Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide. Lanham Md.: University Press of America, 1993: 300. Grachev M.N. Politicheskaja kommunikacija: teoreticheskie koncepcii, modeli, vektory razvitija. Moskva: Prometej, 2004: 325, 328. Hall S. Encoding. Decoding. Media and Cultural Studies: Keyworks. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers, 2001: 166–176.
Iyengar Sh., Kinder D.R. News that Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987: 187. Iyengar Sh. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991: 195. Katz E. Communication Research and the Image of Society. (American Journal of Sociology). Glencoe: Free Press, 1960: 435–440. Kemerov V.E. Obekt, obektivnost’, subektivnost’. (Sovremennyj filosofskij slovar’). Minsk: PANPRINT, 1998: 602.
Lasswell H.D. The Structure and Function of Communication in Society. The Communication of Ideas. L. Bryson. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1948: 43.
Lasswell H.D. Propaganda Technique in the World War. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., 1927: 221, 222. Lazarsfeld P.F. On Social Research and its Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993: 333.
Lippman U. Obshhestvennoe mnenie. Moskva: Institut Fonda “Obshhestvennoe mnenie”, 2004: 384. Naumov E.Ju. Kovarnoe obajanie dialoga. (Prava cheloveka v dialoge kul’tur) Moskva: RGGU, 1998: 105.
Neuman W.R., McKnight, L. Solomon R.J. The Gordian Knot: Political Gridlock on the Information Highway. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1997: 324.
Sharan P. Sravnitel’naja politologija. Moskva: Rossijskaja akademija upravlenija, 1992: 266.
Solov’ev A.I. Politicheskaja kommunikacija: k probleme teoreticheskoj identifikacii. Polis., 2002: 7, 11. Wiener N. Chelovek upravljajushhij. SPb.: Piter, 2001: 124, 152.
Shennon K. Raboty po teorii informacii i kibernetike. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo inostrannoj literatury, 1969: 829.
Wiener N. Kibernetika, ili Upravlenie i svjaz’ v zhivotnom i mashine. Moskva: Nauka; Glavnaja redakcija izdanij dlja zaru- bezhnyh stran, 1983: 124.
Weiss W. Effects of the Mass Media of Communication. The Handbook of Social Psychology. Reading MA, 1969: 137.
