Narrative analysis of documentary films by Kanat Beisekeyev as an example of new media publicism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26577/HJ.2022.v65.i3.08
        237 155

Abstract

The article is devoted to the topic of the search for ethnic identity of Kazakhs in the journalism of new media on the example of the works of Kazakhstani independent director Kanat Beisekeyev. The purpose of the study is to determine the methods of disclosure of this topic through narrative analysis. The research devoted to the study of the YouTube platform as a media for broadcasting documentaries, since the object of the study was published on the personal YouTube channel of director Beisekeyev.

This study is an example of the use of narrative analysis of a documentary film as an example of journalism in new media, which represents the scientific value of the work. The author of the article reveals the director's stylistic devices, thanks to which the theme of ethnic identity is revealed more effectively. In terms of practical significance, the article defines a documentary as one of the way to comprehend socially important topics in journalism.

The results of the study showed the positive nature of the collaboration between the official media and an independent author based on the YouTube platform. The popularity of video hosting, which has turned into social media in recent years, will grow every year, and therefore it is worth paying attention to the analysis of high-quality, educational content on YouTube. In practical terms, the study makes a proposal to consider the possibility of developing intercultural and interethnic communication through the creation of documentaries.

The main message of Beisekeyev's films about the search for the ethnic identity of the Kazakhs is the development of the Kazakh language and preservation of the Kazakh culture.

Keywords:  YouTube, documentary, narrative, publicism, new media.

References

1. Айнаулова, К. и Алимбаева, К. “Тенденции развития документального кино Республики”. Тенденции развития киноискусства Казахстана. Алма-Ата: Гылым, 1990.
2. Боринская, С.А. и Янковский, Н.К. “Генетика и геномика человека. Популяции и этносы в пространстве и времени: эволюционные и медицинские аспекты” Вавиловский журнал генетики и селекции., №17 (2015): с. 930–934.
3. ван ден Аккер, Р. Метамодернизм. Историчность, Аффект и Глубина после постмодернизма. Москва: РИПОЛ классик, 2021.
4. Ворошилов, В.В. Журналистика: учебник. Москва: КНОРУС, 2016.
5. Землянова, Л.М. Коммуникативистика и средства информации: Англо-русский толковый словарь концепций и терминов. Москва: Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 2004.
6. Новикова, А.А. Телевизионная реальность. Экранная интерпретация действительности. Москва: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2013.
7. Пронин А.А. Маss-док: презумпция нарративности. СПб.: ИД «Петрополис», 2016.
8. Рейнгольд, Г. Умная толпа: новая социальная революция. Москва: ФАИР-ПРЕСС, 2006.
9. Шергова, К.А. Становление жанров документального телекино (1960-е – начало 2000-х гг.). Академия медиаиндустрии, 2016.
10. Эльзессер, Т. и Хагенер, М. Теория кино. Глаз, эмоции, тело. СПб.: Сеанс, 2016.
11. Bill, N. Introduction to Documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010.
12. Elias, N. and Sulkin, I. “YouTube viewers in diapers: An exploration of factors associated with amount of toddlers’ online viewing”. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace. №11(3) (2017): https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-3-2
13. Fedele, M. and Aran-Ramspott, S. and & Suau, J. “Preferências e Práticas dos Pré-Adolescentes no YouTube: Resultados de um Estudo Realizado na Catalunha”. Comunicação E Sociedade. №39 (2021): p. 145-166.
14. Jarrett K. “Beyond Broadcast YourselfTM: The Future of Youtube” Media International Australia. №126(1) (2008): p. 132-144.
15. Litvinenko A. “YouTube as Alternative Television in Russia: Political Videos During the Presidential Election Campaign 2018 Volume”. Social Media + Society. №7 (1) (2021): https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984455
16. Moskowitz, M.L. Internet Video Culture in China: YouTube, Youku, and the Space in Between. New York: Routledge, 2019.
17. Thelwall, M. “Lifestyle information from YouTube influencers: some consumption patterns”. Journal of Documentation. Vol. 77 No. 6. (2021): p. 1209-1222.
18. Waldfogel J. “Lost on the web: Does web distribution stimulate or depress television viewing?”. Information Economics and Policy. Vol. 21, No. 2. (2009): p. 158-168.
19. Weibel D. and di Francesco R. and Kopf R. and Fahrni S. and Brunner A. and Kronenberg P. and Lobmaier J.S. and Reber T.P. and Mast F.W. and Wissmath B. “TV vs. YouTube: TV Advertisements Capture More Visual Attention, Create More Positive Emotions and Have a Stronger Impact on Implicit Long-Term Memory”. Front. Psychol. №10 (626). 2019: doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00626
20. Weihl, A. The 'New' Documentary Nexus – Networked|Networking in Interactive Assemblages. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2019.

References
1. Ainaulova, K. i Alimbaeva, K. “Tendencii razvitiya documental’nogo kino Respubliki [Trends in the development of documentary films of the Republic]”. Tendencii razvitiya kinoiskusstva Kazakhstana [Trends in the development of cinematography in Kazakhstan]. (Gylym, Alma-Ata, 1990) – (in Russian).
2. Borinskaya, S.A. i Yankovskiy, N.K. “Genetika i genomika cheloveka. Populyatsii i etnosy v prostranstve i vremeni: evolyutsionnyye i meditsinskiye aspekty [Human genetics and genomics. Populations and ethnic groups in space and time: evolutionary and medical aspects]”. Vavilovskiy zhurnal genetiki i selektsii. Vol 17, 930-934 (2015): 930 - (in Russian).
3. van den Akker, R. “Metamodernizm. Istorichnost’, Affect I Glubina posle postmodernizma [Metamodernism: Historicity, Affect, and Depth after Postmodernism]”. (RIPOL, Moscow, 2021) – (in Russian).
4. Voroshilov, V.V. “Zhurnalistika [Journalism]”. (KNORUS, Moscow, 2016) – (in Russian).
5. Zemlyanova, L.M. “Kommunikativistika I sredstva informacii: anglo-russkyi tolkovyi slovar’ koncepcyi I terminov [Communication Studies and Media: English-Russian explanatory Dictionary of concepts and Terms]” (Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, Moscow, 2004) - (in Russian).
6. Novikova, A.A. “Televizionnaya realʹnostʹ. Ekrannaya interpretatsiya deystvitelʹnosti [TV reality. Screen interpretation of reality]”. (Ed. House of the Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 2013) - (in Russian).
7. Pronin A.A. “Маss-doc: prezupcia narrativnosti [Mass-doc: the presumption of narrative]”. (Petropolis, St. Petersburg, 2016) - (in Russian).
8. Reingold, G. “Umnaya tolpa: Novaya social’naya revol’uciya [Smart Crowd: A new Social Revolution]”. (FAIR-PRESS, Moscow, 2006) – (in Russian).
9.Shergova, K.A. “Stanovlenie zhanrov dokumental’nogo telekino (1960-ye – nachalo 2000-h godov) [The formation of documentary telekine genres (1960s – early 2000s)]”. (Akademiya mediaindustrii, 2016) – (in Russian).
10. Elzesser, T. I Hagener, M. “Teoriya kino. Glaz, emocii, telo [The theory of cinema. Eye, emotions, body]”. ( Seans, Snt Petergurg, 2016) – (in Russian).
11. Bill, N. (2010), “Introduction to Documentary”. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
12. Elias, N. and & Sulkin, I. (2017), “YouTube viewers in diapers: An exploration of factors associated with amount of toddlers’ online viewing”, Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-3-2
13. Fedele, M. and Aran-Ramspott, S. and & Suau, J. (2021), “Preferências e Práticas dos Pré-Adolescentes no YouTube: Resultados de um Estudo Realizado na Catalunha”, Comunicação E Sociedade, 39, PP. 145-166. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.39(2021).2714
14. Jarrett K. (2008), “Beyond Broadcast YourselfTM: The Future of Youtube”, Media International Australia, 126(1), PP. 132-144. doi:10.1177/1329878X0812600114
15. Litvinenko A. (2021), “YouTube as Alternative Television in Russia: Political Videos During the Presidential Election Campaign 2018Volume”, Social Media + Society, 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984455
16. Moskowitz, M.L. (2019), Internet Video Culture in China: YouTube, Youku, and the Space in Between. 1st ed/ Routledge, New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429259913
17. Thelwall, M. (2021), “Lifestyle information from YouTube influencers: some consumption patterns”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 77 No. 6, PP. 1209-1222.
18. Waldfogel J. (2009), “Lost on the web: Does web distribution stimulate or depress television viewing?” Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 21, No. 2, PP 158-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.11.002
19. Weibel D. and di Francesco R. and Kopf R. and Fahrni S. and Brunner A. and Kronenberg P. and Lobmaier J.S. and Reber T.P. and Mast F.W. and Wissmath B. (2019), “TV vs. YouTube: TV Advertisements Capture More Visual Attention, Create More Positive Emotions and Have a Stronger Impact on Implicit Long-Term Memory”, Front. Psychol, 10 (626). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00626
20. Weihl, A. (2019), “The 'New' Documentary Nexus Networked|Networking in Interactive Assemblages”. Newcastle, Cambridge Scholars.

Downloads

How to Cite

Suleimenova, A. E. (2022). Narrative analysis of documentary films by Kanat Beisekeyev as an example of new media publicism. Herald of Journalism, 65(3), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.26577/HJ.2022.v65.i3.08