Transformation of socio-political communication in the digital age and clarification of scientific definitions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26577/HJ.2021.v59.i1.07Abstract
The article examines the issues of transformation of social relations and their strengthening through the forms of communication in the new era, the problems of integration of socio-political communica- tion and the improvement of scientific definitions, the processes used.
The purpose of the investigation. Analyzing the basic models of the theory of political communica- tion, the author tries to prove the hypothesis that instead of centralized one-way communication comes a form of information dissemination with enhanced feedback communication and inter-audit communi- cation. This is due to the fact that digital technologies lead to the increase of “horizontal” streams with
“vertical” communication between participants in the exchange of information. The value of research. The author establishes interdependence between the reduction of political and social activity of the citizen and the absence of feedback from the political structure with society. Such dependence is valued as a factor that aggravates the dissatisfaction of society with the actions of the authorities. Metodologiya research includes in itself such scientific methods as observation and comparison, writing, systematiza- tion of facts and sociometric methods.
Results of the scientific article. The article systematizes and analyzes the role and changes in the competencies of socio-political communication in the conditions of rapid development of the digital environment. Recommendations on the unification of scientific definitions used in the study of the pro- cesses of socio-political communication are developed. For example, on the basis of official documents are given the grounds for the use of the concept of “means of mass communications” and “means of mass information”.
The article highlights the communicative approaches that enhance the influence and dynamics of social processes in political life and are factors that increase activity in society.
Key words: communication interaction, vertical communication, political actors, socialization, me- diacracy.
References
Asadullina, S. H. (2009). Theory and practice of permission of the virtual conflict: Practice-oriented monograph / Nestor Publ., St. Petersburg. – 327 p. (In Russian)
Ахатова Б.А. Политический дискурс и языковое сознание. – Алматы: Экономика, 2006. – 302 с.
Дорбетханулы Т. Партиялық саяси имиджді қалыптастырудағы коммуникациялық байланыстың рөлі // «Саясат» журналы, №2, 2003. – 62-64 бб.
Giddens A. The Consequences of Modernity. – Moscow: Praksis, 2011. – 352 p.
Castells M. Power of communication: a manual. – Мoscow: Izdatel’stvo Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2016. – 564 p.
Coleman J. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost, no.3 2001. – РР.121-139. Ибраев А.Ж. Основные направления политики реализации связей с общественностью (на примере НДП «Нур Отан»):
автореф. …канд. политических наук: 23.00.02. – Алматы, 2008. – 24 с.
Қалиев H. Қазақстан Парламентаризмі: саяси талдау. – Алматы: «Қазақстан» баспасы, 2003. – 272 б.
Nair B., Janenova S., Serikbayeva B. (2019). A Primer on Policy Communication in Kazakhstan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981-15-0610-9_1
Lasarsfeld P. Personal influence: the Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications / N.Y., 1971. – Р.254.
Mc Lean I. Economics and Politics. Companion to Contemporary Economic Thoght / London New York: Routhledge.1991. – Р.846.
Miller D. Artefacts and the meaning of things, Companion encyclopedia of anthropology / London, New York: Routledge, 1994. – РР.396-420.
Мангейм Дж.Б., Рич Р.К. Политология. Методы исследования / пер. с англ., предисл. А.К. Соколова. – М.: Издательство
«Весь Мир», 1997. – 544 с.
Сабитов P.A. Политический анализ теории коммуникативного процесса Г. Лассуэлла и его роль в формировании информационной политики. – Краснодар: Кубанский гос. техн. ун-т, 1999. – 233 с.
Санстебан Л.С. Основы политической науки. – М.: Наука, 1992. – 102 с. Seligmen A. The Problem of Trust. – Moscow: Ideya-Press, 2002. – 256 p.
Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research. Technics and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory / Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc., 2012. – 312 p.
Sztompka P. Society in action: the theory of social becoming / Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014. – 219 p.
Thomas, T. C., Price, L. L., & Schau, H. J. (2014). When differences unite: Resource dependence in heterogeneous consumption communities // Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5). – РР.1010‐1033.
Yessenbekova U.M. (2019). Transformation of human and society in the digital age (media-psychological aspect). Scientific monograph / Approved by the Academic Council of L.N.Gumilyov ENU, Printing house of L.N.Gumilyov ENU. – Astana. – 2019.
– Р.226. [in Kazakhstan]
Fukuyama F. Trust: Social virtue and path to prosperity. – Moscow: ACT-Ermak, 2004. – 730 p.
Хабермас Ю. Моральное сознание и коммуникативное действие. Научное издание. – СПб.: Питер, 2000. – 380 с
References
Adali S., Escriva R., Goldberg M. (2010). Measuring behavioral trust in social networks. IX International Conference on Intel- ligence and Security Informatics, Vancouver (Canada), 23-26 May 2010. – pp.150-152.
Asadullina, S. H. (2009). Theory and practice of permission of the virtual conflict: Practice-oriented monograph / Nestor Publ., St. Petersburg. – 327 p. (In Russian)ю
Akhatova B.A. Politicheskiy diskurs i yazykovoye soznaniye / [Political discourse and language consciousness] Almaty: Eko- nomika. 2006. – 302 s.
Dorbetkhanuly T. Partiyalyk sayasi imidzhdі qalyptastyrudagy kommunikatsiyalyk baylanystyng rolі // «Sayasat» zhurnaly.
№2. 2003. – 62-64 bb.
Nair B., Janenova S., Serikbayeva B., (2019). A Primer on Policy Communication in Kazakhstan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981-15-0610-9_1
Castells M. Power of communication: a manual / Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2016. – 564 p.
Coleman J. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost, no.3 2001. – pp.121-139. Ibrayev A.Zh. Osnovnyye napravleniya politiki realizatsii svyazey s obshchestvennostyu (na primere NDP «Nur Otan»): av-
toref. …kand. politicheskikh nauk: 23.00.02. – Almaty. 2008. – 24 s.
Kaliyev H. Kazakstan Parlamentarizmі: sayasi taldau / Almaty: «Kazakstan» baspasy. 2003. – 272 b. Giddens A. The Consequences of Modernity / Moscow: Praksis, 2011. – 352 p.
Lasarsfeld P. Personal influence: the Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications / N.Y., 1971. – p.254.
Mc Lean I. Economics and Politics. Companion to Contemporary Economic Thoght / London New York: Routhledge.1991. – p.846.
Miller D. Artefacts and the meaning of things, Companion encyclopedia of anthropology / London, New York: Routledge, 1994. – pp.396-420.
Seligmen A. The Problem of Trust / Moscow: Ideya-Press, 2002. – 256 p.
Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research. Technics and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory / Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc., 2012. – 312 p.
Sztompka P. Society in action: the theory of social becoming / Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014. – 219 p.
Thomas, T. C., Price, L. L., & Schau, H. J. (2014). When differences unite: Resource dependence in heterogeneous consumption communities // Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5). – pp.1010‐1033.
Yessenbekova U.M., (2019). Transformation of human and society in the digital age (media-psychological aspect). Scientific monograph / Approved by the Academic Council of L.N.Gumilyov ENU, Printing house of L.N.Gumilyov ENU. – Astana. – 2019.
– p.226. [in Kazakhstan]
Mangejm Dzh. B., Rich R.K. Politologiya. Metody issledovaniya [Political science. Research methods] / per. s angl., predisl.
A.K.Sokolova. – M.: Izdatelstvo «Ves Mir», 1997. – 544 p.
Sabitov P.A. Politicheskij analiz teorii kommunikativnogo processa G.Lassuella i ego rol v formirovanii informacionnoj politiki [Political analysis of the theory of the communicative process of G. Lasswell and its role in the formation of information policy] / Krasnodar: Kubanskij gos. tehn. un-t, 1999. – 233 p.
Sansteban L.S. Osnovy politicheskoj nauki [Fundamentals of Political Science] / M.: Nauka, 1992. – 102 p. Fukuyama F. Trust: Social virtue and path to prosperity / Moscow: ACT-Ermak, 2004. – 730 p.
Habermas Yu. Moralnoe soznanie i kommunikativnoe dejstvie [Moral consciousness and communicative action] / Nauchnoe izdanie. S-Pb.: Piter, 2000. – 380 p.
