The effectiveness of information and communicative processes: theories and problems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26577/HJ.2024.v72.i2.5Keywords:
communication, information, effectiveness, communicator, respondent, management, civilization.Abstract
This article considers the main theories of information and communication processes, which have become classics in the field of media research, as well as actual problems related to their implementation in modern institutions of society. The aim of the study is to research the effectiveness of information and communication processes that meet the ideas of humanism, counteracting manipulative technologies of impact on human consciousness. The significance of research lies in its scientific and practical implications, which are influenced by contemporary issues in the application of media technologies. Primarily, these issues revolve around the removal of spiritual and moral experiences from the societal perspective in an increasingly globalized world.
The methodology of the study includes historical and dialogue approaches, directed on the analysis of communicative bases through the prism of humanity development. As a result of the analysis of the selected topic, the author concludes that it is communicative processes aimed at the construction and formation of equal dialogue between communicators are priority to overcome the acute problem of spiritual values in a global society. The effectiveness of information and communication processes is directly related to interactivity practices that focus on dialogue and can help a person overcome feelings of frustration. The value of the conducted research is determined by the author’s attempt to apply ethical communicative practices in the development and implementation of modern mass communication technologies, which is the greatest difficulty, because the present conditions of economic competition have intensified the manipulative nature of information flows. The practical importance of this scientific endeavor lies in the potential application of the communication theories investigated by the author. Specifically, these theories can be utilized to address challenges related to the efficiency of information processes in the realm of mass communication.
References
Блэк С. (1990) Паблик рилейшнз: что это такое? М.: Новости.
Дриккер А.С. (2000) Человечество: информационный идеал // Человек. № 1, 37 - 45.
Зверинцев А.Б. (1995) Коммуникационный менеджмент. Рабочая книга менеджера PR. СПб.: Издательство Буковского.
Каган М.С. (1988) Мир общения. М.: Политиздат.
Конецкая В.П. (1997) Социология коммуникации. М.: Международный ин-т бизнеса и управления.
Королько В.Г. (2000) Основы паблик рилейшнз. М.: Рефл-бук; Киев: Ваклер.
Лакан Ж. (2000) Телевидение. М.: ИТДК «Гнозис», Издательство «Логос».
Маклюэн М. (2003) Понимание медиа: Внешние расширения человека. М.: Канон-Пресс-Ц.
Мескон М., Альберт М., Хедоури Ф. (1992) Основы менеджмента. М.: Дело.
Поликарпов В.С. (2001) Философия управления. Ростов-на-Дону: Издательство ТРТУ.
Ритцер Дж. (2002) Современные социологические теории. СПб.: Питер.
Хабермас Ю. (2006) Моральное сознание и коммуникативное действие. СПб.: Наука.
Fahmy S., & Johnson T. (2007) Mediating the anthrax attacks: Media accuracy and agenda setting during a time of moral panic. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 15(1), 19–40. doi:10.1080/15456870701212583
Geib S. (2022) The agenda-setting-effects of news factor exposure: A field study comparing the transmission paths and impact of issue exposure and news factor exposure. SAGE Open, 12(2), 1–15. doi:10.1177/21582440221091259
Sellnow T., & Seeger M. (2021) Theorizing crisis communication (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Shafi A. (2017) Personal experience versus media coverage: Testing the issue obtrusiveness condition of agenda-setting theory in a developing country. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(4), 1056–1072. doi:10.1177/1077699016669115
Tsfati Y. (2003). Does audience skepticism of the media matter in agenda setting? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(2), 157–176. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4702_1
McCombs M., & Reynolds A. (2002) News influence on our pictures of the world. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Routledge communication series. Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 1–18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vliegenthart R., & Damstra A. (2019) Parliamentary questions, newspaper coverage, and consumer confidence in times of crisis: A cross-national comparison. Political Communication, 36(1), 17–35. doi:10.1080/10584609.2018.1478472
References
Black S. (1990) Pablik rilejshnz: chto eto takoe? [Public relations: what is it?].
Drikker A.S. Chelovechestvo: informacionnyj ideal // Chelovek [Humanity: information ideal // Human]. 2000. № 1, 37 - 45.
Habermas J. (2006) Moral'noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe dejstvie [Moral consciousness and communicative action]. SPb.: Nauka.
Kagan M.S. (1988) Mir obshhenija [The world of communication]. M.: Politizdat.
Koneckaja V.P. (1997) Sociologija kommunikacii [The sociology of communication]. M.: Mezhdunarodnyj in-t biznesa i upravlenija.
Korolko V.G. (2000) Osnovy pablik rilejshnz [Basics of PR]. M.: Refl-buk; Kiev: Vakler.
Lacan J. (2000) Televidenie [Television]. M.: ITDK “Gnozis”, Izdatel'stvo “Logos”.
McLuhan M. (2003) Ponimanie media: Vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka [Understanding Media: The extensions of man]. M.: Kanon-Press-C.
Mescon M., Albert M., Khedouri F. (1992) Menedzhment [Managment]. M.: Delo.
Polikarpov V.S. (2001) Filosofiya upravleniya [Management philosophy]. Rostov-na-Donu: Izdatel'stvo TRTU.
Ritzer G. (2002) Sovremennye sociologicheskie teorii [Modern Sociological Theory]. SPb.: Piter.
Zverintsev A.B. (1995) Kommunikacionnyj menedzhment. Rabochaya kniga menedzhera PR [Communication Management. PR Manager’s Working Book]. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Bukovskogo.
Fahmy S., & Johnson T. (2007) Mediating the anthrax attacks: Media accuracy and agenda setting during a time of moral panic. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 15(1), 19–40. doi:10.1080/15456870701212583
Geib S. (2022) The agenda-setting-effects of news factor exposure: A field study comparing the transmission paths and impact of issue exposure and news factor exposure. SAGE Open, 12(2), 1–15. doi:10.1177/21582440221091259
Sellnow T., & Seeger M. (2021) Theorizing crisis communication (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Shafi A. (2017) Personal experience versus media coverage: Testing the issue obtrusiveness condition of agenda-setting theory in a developing country. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(4), 1056–1072. doi:10.1177/1077699016669115
Tsfati Y. (2003). Does audience skepticism of the media matter in agenda setting? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(2), 157–176. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4702_1
McCombs M., & Reynolds A. (2002) News influence on our pictures of the world. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Routledge communication series. Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 1–18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vliegenthart R., & Damstra A. (2019) Parliamentary questions, newspaper coverage, and consumer confidence in times of crisis: A cross-national comparison. Political Communication, 36(1), 17–35. doi:10.1080/10584609.2018.1478472
Information about author:
Doskhozhina Zhanat Melsovna – PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Mediacommunication and History of Kazakhstan, International Information Technology University (Almaty, Kazakhstan, e-mail: zhanatdoskhozhina@gmail.com).
Автор туралы мәлімет:
Досхожина Жанат Мэлсовна – PhD, Қауымдастырылған профессор, Медиакоммуникация және Қазақстан тарихы кафедрасы, Халықаралық ақпараттық технологиялар университеті, Алматы, Қазақстан, e-mail: zhanatdoskhozhina@gmail.com).
Поступило 14 января 2024 г.
Принято 21 марта 2024 г.
